Thursday, March 26, 2020

Title of the Paper Essays (1626 words) - , Term Papers

Title of the Paper ( Court Case Briefing/Analysis ) Submitted By ( Zaevon Prince, PrinceZ0924 @students.bowiestate.edu) Number and Name of Course (Criminal Justice Victim Crime Justice- CRMJ 315 ) Class Meeting Time/Day (T: 7:35 P .M. - 10:00 P .M.) Professor (Dr. Donine Carrington ) Semester (Fall 2016) Today's Date (Thursday December 15 , 2016) Bowie State University Department of Criminal Justice Arts Science Bowie, Maryland The case of Fernandez v. California ( 134 S. Ct. 1126) involves the issue of The Fourth Amendment rules governing a police investigation of a crime, (Pet.Brief 2). On October 12, 2009, Abel Lopez was approached by a man, whom Lopez later identified as petitioner, after he had cashed his check. Petitioner told Lopez that he was in petitioner's "territory" and demanded Lopez's money (Pet. Brief 2). Officers Joseph Cirrito and Kelly Clark drove to a nearby alley. As the officers stood in the alley, two men walked by. One of them, who appeared frightened, told the officers, "the guy is in the apartment." After walking away quickly, the man returned and said, "He's in there. He's in the apartment." Officers Cirrito and Clark then saw a man run across the alley and enter the house identified by the man (U.S. Brief 2). Officer Cirrito "heard sounds of screaming and fighting from the apartment building into which the suspect had run." After an additional officer arrived, t he two main officers on the scene went to knock on the door from where the screaming came and Ms. Roxanne Rojas, who was holding a baby, opened the door. She appeared to be crying; her face was red; she had a "big bump" on her nose; and she had fresh blood from an injury on her shirt and fresh blood on her hand (U.S.Brief 3). Cirrito asked Rojas to step outside so that he could "conduct a sweep of the apartment". The turning point had been when petitioner came to the door. He was dressed in only boxer shorts, was sweaty and looked "real angry" (U.S. Brief 4). Cirrito asked petitioner to step outside because the police suspected he had battered Rojas and wanted to separate the two. Petitioner then yelled "you don't have any right to come in here. I know my rights." The officers then restrained petitioner because of the evidence of domestic violence and escorted him out of the apartment (U.S. Brief 4). A tattoo was spotted at the top of the petitioner's head that matched the descripti on of the man who robbed Lopez. After Cirrito returned to the apartment, he told Rojas that petitioner had been identified as suspect in the robbery and asked for consent to search. Rojas consented both orally and in writing. Officers then searched the apartment and found Drifters gang paraphernalia, a knife that might have been used in the robbery, and a sawed-off shotgun. Petitioner was charged with robbery, infliction of corporal injury on a spouse, cohabitant, or child's parent, possession of a firearm by a felon, possession of a short barreled shotgun, and felony possession of ammunition (U.S.Brief 5). He proceeded to trial on the robbery and infliction of corporal injury counts. He was convicted and sentenced to 14 years of imprisonment. This case reached the U.S. Supreme Court through the writ of certiorari to the California Court of Appeal, second appellate district. This case came on appeal, which was long after Fernandez's trial where he had been found guilty. Petitioner had petitioned to have his case considered by the California Court of Appeals. After he lost there, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to petitioner's case. This was granted because the case involves the fourth amendment, which is in the Constitution, and the Supreme Court want to hear it because of the issue. The U.S has jurisdiction to hear this case because in nearly all of the cases heard by the Supreme Court, the Court exercises the appellate jurisdiction granted it by Article III of the Constitution . This authority permits the Court to review - and affirm or overturn - decisions made by lower courts on Constitutional issues. The legal issue presented in this case is whether the fourth amendment right of the people "being secure

Friday, March 6, 2020

Life and Times of Sir Isaac Newton essays

Life and Times of Sir Isaac Newton essays Newton, Sir Isaac (1642-1727), mathematician and physicist, one of the foremost scientific intellects of all time. Born at Woolsthorpe, near Grantham in Lincolnshire, where he went to school, he began to attend Cambridge University in 1661; he was elected a Fellow of Trinity College in 1667, and a Lucasian mathematics professor in 1669. He stayed at the university, lecturing most of the years, until 1696. During these Cambridge years, in which Newton was at the top of his creative power, he singled out 1665-1666 as "the prime of his age for invention". During two to three years of intense mental effort he prepared Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy) known mostly as the Principia, though it was not put into print until 1687. As a firm opponent of the attempt by King James II to make the universities into Catholic institutions, Newton was elected Member of Parliament for the University of Cambridge to the Convention Parliament of 1689, and was also re-elected again in 1701-1702. Meanwhile, in 1696 he had moved to London as Warden of the Royal Mint. He became Master of the Mint in 1699, an office he held to his death. He was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of London in 1671, and in 1703 he became President of the society, being annually re-elected for the rest of his life. His major work Opticks, appeared the next year; he was knighted in Cambridge in 1705. As Newtonian science became increasingly accepted on the Continent, and especially after a general peace was restored in 1714, following the War of the Spanish Succession, Newton became the most highly esteemed philosopher in Europe. His last decades were passed in revising his major works, polishing his studies of ancient history, and defending himself against critics, as well as carrying out his official duties. Newton was modest, reserved, and a man of simple tastes. He was upset by criticism or opposition...