A geopolitical analysis of The Clinton Administration's 1995 National Research Paper

A geopolitical analysis of The Clinton Administrations 1995 National Security dodging - Research Paper ExampleThe field of study certification dodging of 1995 Clinton administration was listed out in a document titled, A National Security system of Engagement and Enlargement, published by the White House in February 1995 (The White House, 1995). The invigorated schema had its attention more focused on the ethnic conflicts which were on the rise all over the world and also the challenges raised by the so-called rogue states (The White House, 1995, p.1 of preface). Anformer(a) major aspect of the change that was reflected in the NSS 1995 was the shifting of attention of the US from the communist nations, towards a wider geopolitical realm, to say, the whole world. Geo-politically, the 2 major concerns, which have prompted the formulation of a new security strategy for the US, had been the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the political instability in many countri es and regions caused by population explosion and environmental degradation (The White House, 1995, p.1 of preface). It was evident that the US was redefining its national security concerns on geo-political lines rather than the previous practice of seeing national security in relation with the ideological realm, especially communism. The immediate yet confirming threats to global political stability from certain regions and nations based on geopolitical issues like ethnicity, and environment were seriously accounted for, the first time in US history. The new National Security Strategy was prepared in accordance with Section 603 of the Goldwater- Nichols Defense Department Reorganization Act 1986 (The White House, 1995, p.1 of preface). The declared key objectives of this strategy document had been, to sustain our Americas security with host forces that are ready to fight, to bolster Americas economic revitalization and to promote democracy abroad (The White House, 1995, p.1 of pr eface). The first two objectives represented the cancel security concerns of any nation but the third objective was specific to America with its long history of intervening in the matters of other nations with a vision of a global super power. And the attention imparted to link the economic development of the nation with the security aspect is again unique to the US. This is an forefinger of the geo-political stand that this country has been adopting ever since its establishment as a rich and powerful nation. The dependence of the US economy on weapon trade, oil, and other natural resources (scarce inside the nation and available in plenty in the third world and the Middle East) can be one reason why concepts of security become entangled with internal matters of foreign countries and regions for this nation, thus giving national security a distinct global geopolitical edge. For example Saudi Arabia has been the largest node for US military hardware (Cohen, 2003, p.356). Similarly, the greatest labor force that America has to run its industries has been flowing from Mexico (Cohen, 2003, p.135). And the United States invaded Haiti in 1915 to protect U.S. investments and properties in a military occupation that lasted until 1934 (Cohen, 2003, p.107). Making of the NSS The National Security Strategy document is prepared by the US government administration beginning the process with a pet approach to national security (Bartolotto, 2004, p.6). The process of initiating, controlling, developing, writing, and publishing the NSS is entrusted with the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, who also is the head of